Add MachineTool, WMTP, GMS and CranesHoists companions (#4765)

# Description

_Describe the changes here to communicate to the maintainers why they
should accept this pull request. By default - this will become the
Commit message after merging and thus define history._

Add provider-backed MachineTool, bundled WMTP, GMS and CranesHoists
companions using the existing Machinery/MachineVision fluent, DI and
typed-client approach. **The PR is open/non-draft by user choice.
Current head `ecc4a7d6ca3e8004cf28ab54da605da302d026bf` is mergeable and
has 108 successful checks, six intentionally skipped checks, zero
failures and zero pending checks. All five primary workflows completed
successfully at that exact head.**

| Family | Released specification/model | Packaging |
| --- | --- | --- |
| MachineTool | OPC 40501-1, 1.02.0 | Model, Server, Client and MCP;
normal root versions |
| WMTP | OPC 40505, 1.0.0 | Bundled in MachineTool; distinct CLR/wire
namespace and independent WMTP-only hosting |
| GMS | OPC 40210 reference 1.0.1, normative model 1.0.0 | Model,
Server, Client and MCP; normal root versions |
| CranesHoists | OPC 40020-1, 1.00 | Model, Server, Client and MCP; all
four plus Debug variants forced preview |

There are **12 new packable projects**. No separate WMTP
package/profile/guide, root version bump, tag, release or package
publication is included. Mandatory instance structure is the default;
selected optional features require explicit providers. The
implementation reuses Machinery results/jobs/files/ProcessValues and
Robotics topology, including retained MachineTool Production, defined
GMS jobs/parts, modern ISA95/Machinery jobs, shared-owner hosting and
isolated instances alongside MachineVision.

Runtime and integration fixes preserve raw quality/timestamps, coherent
acquisition, namespace ownership, accepted-configuration state,
borrowed-resource lifetime, session/node/file cleanup, terminal-value
publication, event propagation and endpoint-aware capability
publication. Firmware/licence transfer means provider acceptance, not
installation/activation. Cancellation does not silently abort another
caller's operation. The later upstream MCP expansion is integrated
without losing either family set or its default-off privileged/live
execution policy.

### Conformance and scope

Canonical model inputs are pinned to UA-Nodeset revision
`96a08945425d0295edb3607d2a38f6841ef44046`.

**GMS upstream exception:** [Annex
A.1](https://reference.opcfoundation.org/specs/OPC-40210/annex-a) makes
the released NodeSet normative, but §12.3.2.7 requires undefined
`GMS_ProductionStatisticsType`. Inherited statistics and defined
jobs/parts are implemented without inventing a standard type/NodeId; the
complete GMS Production facet is withheld.

The requirement ledger records **102 positively evidenced CU rows, 96
directly negative-tested rows and six explicit negative-evidence
limitations**. All 648 test-class/name/TRX links were independently
resolved to passing cases. The six limitations concern Stacklight,
retained legacy PowerOnDuration, Machinery PowerOnDuration, WorkingUnit,
Obligation and MaintenanceMode. They are not claims that every
invalid-input or hardware-control behavior was tested. The undefined GMS
requirement is outside the 102 defined CUs. No external certification
claim is made.

Retained baseline complete-assembly line coverage, with generated code
retained and no source exclusions:

| Family | Model | Server | Client |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| MachineTool/WMTP | 83.80% | 91.98% | 84.74% |
| GMS | 95.51% | 90.63% | 88.38% |
| CranesHoists | 92.76% | 94.45% | 92.24% |

These nine measurements predate the later focused review fixes and
merges; they are not relabelled as new `ecc4a7d6c` percentages. The
current head's separate CI code-coverage check succeeded. No new
exclusions or threshold relaxations were introduced.

## Related Issues

- Fixes
[#4764](https://github.com/OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard/issues/4764),
the implementation/design and acceptance tracker.

## Checklist

_Put an `x` in the boxes that apply. You can complete these step by step
after opening the PR._

- [ ] I have signed the
[CLA](https://opcfoundation.org/license/cla/ContributorLicenseAgreementv1.0.pdf)
and read the
[CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
doc.
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works and increased code coverage.
- [x] I have added all necessary documentation.
- [ ] I have verified that my changes do not introduce (new) build or
analyzer warnings.
- [ ] I ran **all** tests locally using the **UA.slnx** solution against
at least .net **framework** and .net **10**, and all passed.
- [ ] I fixed **all** failing and flaky tests in the CI pipelines and
**all** CodeQL warnings.
- [x] I have addressed **all** PR feedback received.

docs/Samples.md

@@ -94,6 +94,16 @@ Minimal Client together.
 - [Machine Vision server](../samples/Vision/MachineVisionServer/README.md) and
   [client](../samples/Vision/MachineVisionClient/README.md) — released OPC 40100-1/-2
   in Machinery, with recipe/file workflows and a shared draft/native inspection engine.
+- [MachineTool and WMTP](../samples/MachineTool/) — separate or combined
+  MachineTool/peripheral hosting, independent simulated instances, retained and
+  modern production, remote files, measurement configuration and record workflows.
+- [GMS server and client](../samples/GMS/) — native systems, qualification,
+  environmental conditions and typed result/characteristic/correction workflows.
+- [Cranes and Hoists](../samples/CranesHoists/) — Robotics-derived topology,
+  acquisition quality and authorized simulated limit requests.
+- [Combined companion suite](../samples/CompanionSuite/) — MachineTool, WMTP,
+  GMS, CranesHoists and MachineVision on one DI/Machinery owner, with isolated
+  instances and a bounded real-session self-check.
 - [Minimal ISA-95 Server](../samples/Isa95/MinimalIsa95Server/README.md) —
   hosts the OPC-10030 ISA-95 Common Model with OPC-10031-4 Job Control V1 and
   V2, using the typed common-model builder and in-memory Job Control provider.