mirror of
https://github.com/OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard.git
synced 2026-10-26 04:19:53 +08:00
aas
7
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 romanettandCopilot App
|
8d2d363d04 |
Add MultiState Discrete write validation (#4255)
## Summary Adds hand-written partial state classes that enforce OPC UA Part 8 §5.3.3 write validation for the `DiscreteItemType` subtypes, plus tests. ## Details - **`MultiStateDiscreteState`** — a written value is treated as an index into `EnumStrings`. Returns `BadOutOfRange` when the index is outside `[0, len)`. - **`MultiStateValueDiscreteState`** — a written value is matched against the sparse `EnumValues` set. Returns `BadOutOfRange` when no entry matches. On a good write, `ValueAsText` is refreshed from the matching entry's display name. - **`DiscreteItemState`** — provides the shared `TryGetIntegerValue` helper that normalizes any scalar integer built-in type to `long` (the exact-type `Variant` accessors return `default` on a built-in-type mismatch, so a `BuiltInType` switch is required). - **`TwoStateDiscreteType`** intentionally has no hand-written class. These 3 classes are `public partial class` extending the source-generated DataAccess partials already present on `master`. They read via the typed properties (`EnumStrings`, `EnumValues`, `ValueAsText`) rather than `FindChild`, because `BaseDataVariableState.FindChild` special-cases the `EnumStrings` BrowseName and never falls through to the `AddChild`'d children. ## Testing - `dotnet build src\Opc.Ua.Core.Types\Opc.Ua.Core.Types.csproj -c Release -f net10.0` → 0 warnings, 0 errors. - 13 tests across `MultiStateDiscreteStateTests` and `MultiStateValueDiscreteStateTests` pass (13 passed, 0 failed). --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
romanettandCopilot App
|
aef86ba9dc |
Add SelectionListType write validation (#4254)
## Summary Adds write-validation for the standard OPC UA `SelectionListType` VariableType via the handwritten `SelectionListState` partial, plus unit tests. Split out of #4220 into its own PR against `master`. ## The feature `SelectionListState` overrides `WriteValueAttribute` to enforce **OPC UA Part 5 section 7.18**: when the optional `RestrictToList` property is present and `true`, a written value must be one of the entries in the mandatory `Selections` property. Behavior contract: - Validation **gates on `RestrictToList`** — only enforced when the property is present and true. Otherwise the base-class behavior applies unchanged. - **Empty `Selections` rejects all** values (nothing is a valid member). - Membership is **data-type independent** — determined via `Variant` equality rather than any specific built-in type. - **Mismatched built-in types defer to the base class** for its normal type validation. The generated `SelectionListState` partial (base `BaseDataVariableState`, typed `Selections`/`SelectionDescriptions`/`RestrictToList` properties) is produced by the source generator from the core address space; this handwritten partial supplies only the write-validation override, using a single clean generic helper. ## Validation - Build `Opc.Ua.Core.Types` (net10.0, Release): **0 warnings, 0 errors**. - `SelectionListStateTests` (net10.0, Release): **14 passed, 0 failed**. --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Marc SchierandCopilot
|
1cca744b5c |
Retire the last exposed locks: node, browser, server diagnostics and application properties (#4222)
Closes #4201. Closes #4202. Closes #4203. Closes #4215. Closes #4216. (#4215 and #4216 are @marcschier's originals from the #4188 review; #4202 and #4201 are my later duplicates of the same two findings. All four describe the two changes in section 1 and are closed together.) **This PR now carries what was #4221 as well.** The two were a stack; they have been unstacked and combined here, and #4221 is closed. Everything below the "Read the server diagnostics" section is the work that was previously reviewed as #4221. --- ## 1. The browse path guards itself, and the last node locks are gone `AsyncCustomNodeManager` kept two `lock (source)` sites around `CreateBrowser`, carrying a NOTE that browser creation was not internally synchronized. `NodeBrowser` still handed its lock to derived types through `protected Lock DataLock`. `NodeState.CreateBrowser` now holds a browse lock across `PopulateBrowser` and `OnPopulateBrowser`, so browser construction on a node is serialized — which is what the external `lock (source)` was actually providing, and what a handler that mutates the node during population (the historian's lazy config installer) depends on. Both `lock (source)` statements and the NOTE are gone. **What that lock does not do**, stated plainly in the XML docs and in `docs/NodeManagers.md` rather than over-promised: it is not an atomic snapshot across the node's children, notifiers and references. Writers take those collections' own locks, not the browse lock. The browser is a point-in-time copy and each collection is read consistently, but the combination is not a transaction. No `lock` takes a `NodeState` as its sync root any more. That was the last thing keeping `NodeState` from being documentably self-guarding, so the other eleven went with it: `lock (activeNode)`, `lock (target)`, `lock (source.Node)`, `lock (target.Node)`, `lock (notifier)`, `lock (handle.Node)` in `AsyncCustomNodeManager`, and `lock (node)` in `CustomNodeManager2`. Most were a check-then-act pair now served by `NodeState.AddReferenceIfMissing`, which does the check and the insert under the node's own lock. `NodeBrowser.DataLock` is removed. A browser is **single-consumer**: it belongs to whoever created it, and both server browse paths already serialize on the owning side. The exposed lock only added an inheritance-level locking contract that a derived browser could not reason about. ## 2. Read the server diagnostics under the lock every writer takes `OnUpdateDiagnostics` locked the diagnostics **payload** rather than the lock every writer takes through `UpdateServerDiagnostics`, so the snapshot a client reads from the `ServerDiagnostics` node was never excluded from a concurrent writer. Both halves matter, and the second is the one that is easy to miss: ```csharp lock (m_diagnosticsLock) // was: lock (ServerDiagnostics) { value = Variant.FromStructure(ServerDiagnostics, copy: true); // was: copy defaulted to false } ``` `copy: true` is what makes it a snapshot. `FromStructure(value, copy: false)` does `new ExtensionObject(value, copy)` — it wraps the **live** structure without copying it, so the caller would read the fields long after the lock was released and see them change underneath. Swapping the lock alone would have looked like a fix while still excluding nothing. ## 3. Analyzer numbering The browser rule is **UA0027**, not UA0025. This branch had independently taken UA0025 for `NodeBrowser.DataLock` while #4188 published UA0025 for `ILocalNode.DataLock` and UA0026 for `BaseVariableValue.Lock`. Master's are shipped, so they keep the numbers: | | UA0025 | UA0026 | UA0027 | |---|---|---|---| | master (#4188) | `ILocalNode.DataLock` | `BaseVariableValue.Lock` | — | | **this PR** | `ILocalNode.DataLock` | `BaseVariableValue.Lock` | **`NodeBrowser.DataLock`** | Both sides had written a different `UA0025Tests.cs`, which arrived as an add/add conflict. They are now split: `UA0025Tests.cs` holds master's `ILocalNode` tests, `UA0027Tests.cs` holds the `NodeBrowser` ones. UA0024's help text also drops its reference to `ReadServerDiagnostics`, which #4193 removed as unused, and names `ISession.ReadDiagnostics` / `ISubscription.ReadDiagnostics` instead — those do still exist. ## 4. Two more locks reachable from outside their owner **`ApplicationConfiguration.PropertiesLock` is removed.** It returned the properties dictionary itself, so `lock (configuration.PropertiesLock)` was `lock (configuration.Properties)` — the lock *was* the data it guarded, the same shape as #4203. It had exactly one production consumer (`OAuth2CredentialCollection.Load`, a get-or-add with `ParseExtension` called inside the lock), so it could not simply be deleted. `Properties` is now a `ConcurrentDictionary` — same public type, every operation atomic on its own — and the one multi-operation need gets a member of its own: ```csharp public T GetOrAddProperty<T>(string key, Func<T> valueFactory); ``` It deliberately does **not** invoke the factory under a lock, so `ParseExtension` now runs outside any critical section. Holding a lock across a caller-supplied callback is exactly the shape that produced the attribute/diagnostics deadlock earlier in this work. The two existing tests asserted only `PropertiesLock is not null`, so they tested nothing but its presence. They are replaced by tests of the contract: factory runs once for a missing key, not at all for a present one, 32 concurrent callers all observe the same instance, null arguments throw. `PropertiesLock` ships in 1.5.378, so this is a breaking removal — migration guide section plus analyzer **UA0028**. **`SharedDefinitionCache` no longer hands out its lock.** Three sites in `SharedKeyValueSubscriptionStore` took the nested cache's `Lock` to operate on the cache's own dictionary. Both are private now, behind `ReplaceAll` and `CloneWhere`. `SnapshotCommitLock` stays exposed on purpose: it is a `SemaphoreSlim` sequencing an async commit across `await` points, which `System.Threading.Lock` cannot span, so folding it in would change behaviour rather than hide a lock. ## Verification Merged `master` (`0edfe237a`, including #4234) with no conflicts. - `dotnet build UA.slnx` — 0 warnings, 0 errors - `Opc.Ua.Server.Tests` — 4074 passed - `Opc.Ua.Types.Tests` — 8501 passed - `Opc.Ua.MigrationAnalyzer.Tests` — 151 passed on all five TFMs (138 → 151, the new ones being UA0027 and UA0028) - `Opc.Ua.Core.Tests` — 4249 passed - `Opc.Ua.Redundancy.Server.Tests` — 573 passed ## Note for the reviewer @romanett — your approval was given when this PR's diff was the 7 diagnostics files, because it was measured against `marcschier/node-browse-locks`. Now that the two are combined and the base is `master`, the diff is 23 files, and the extra 16 are the node/browser lock work that was #4221. GitHub kept the approval across the retarget, but it did not cover that code, so please re-review rather than let it ride. --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: e9c13dd0-a6e3-4ad2-8ad6-1c3fe6323041 Copilot-Session: b3c0e146-5b9e-4d08-a0f6-db3f940484b1 Copilot-Session: d18f87e9-2484-44ce-98ce-463ba6cf5f63 Copilot-Session: 0ee22c1d-c319-4257-bf78-a5a077a1824a |
||
|
Marc SchierandCopilot
|
e05a820c91 |
Removal of the exposed diagnostics and node locks (#4188)
## What this is Design analysis for `Opc.Ua.Server`, the two rounds of design exploration behind it, and the first two implementation chunks it recommends. Draft: the analyses are ready to read, but the *conclusions* deserve discussion before the larger phases proceed. Later chunks stack onto this PR as they land. | File | Kind | Lines | |---|---|---:| | `plans/NodeManagerAnalysis.md` | Evidence — the node-manager plugin surface | 488 | | `plans/ServerRuntimeAnalysis.md` | Evidence — the server runtime cluster | 576 | | `plans/ServerDesignExploration.md` | Design round 2 — delivery strategy | 1,394 | | `plans/ServerDesignExplorationAlt.md` | Design round 1 — four interface designs | 2,119 | | `src/Opc.Ua.Types/State/NodeState.cs` | **Code** — node self-guards attributes | | | `src/Opc.Ua.Types/State/BaseVariableState.cs` | **Code** — value accessors take the lock | | | `src/Opc.Ua.Server/NodeManager/AsyncCustomNodeManager.cs` | **Code** — 6 external locks removed | | | `tests/…/NodeStateAttributeConcurrencyTests.cs` | **Code** — concurrency safety net | 449 | `docs/` is untouched — it holds shipped feature documentation, and none of this is shipped API. ## The analyses Counted mechanically over `src`, `samples` and `tests`; **every figure is reproducible** from commands printed in each document. **Node manager surface.** `AsyncCustomNodeManager` declares **93 `virtual`/`abstract` members** (80 distinct names). Across the repository: **112 override sites, 25 distinct names ever overridden, 55 of 80 never**. Six carry nearly all real use. For scale, `ReferenceNodeManager` is 6,373 lines and overrides **8**. **Server runtime.** Seven findings, **two of which recommend no change**. Findings 1–5 are filed as #4183–#4187. The headline is an `object`-typed sync root published on three public interfaces and taken in **88 `lock` statements across 7 files**, including a shipped sample. **What is deliberately not flagged.** `IStandardServer` — 9 members over 5,575 lines, 16 of 37 virtuals used — is identified as the reference shape to preserve. `IApplicationInstance` and the already-`[Obsolete]` `Stop()` are examined and left alone. ## The design exploration **Round 1** explored four alternative interfaces in parallel under the current back-compat constraint. Its value is the convergence: four designers who never saw each other's work independently arrived at a 6–9 member `IServerContext` replacing the 57-member locator, removal of the `object` node-manager handle, elimination of the `Processed` protocol, and `IHistorianProvider` as the pattern to copy. **Round 2** re-runs it with back-compat lifted and asks how to deliver: full rewrite versus side-by-side fork. **Both option designers independently declined to recommend their own assignment.** Three structural facts were verified: 1. **The fork line already sits at `IAsyncNodeManager`** — old and new node managers can coexist with zero runtime changes, so a fork duplicates ~10% of the assembly, not all of it. 2. **`[OpcUaShim]` cannot shim an inheritance surface** — honest auto-fix ceiling for the authoring surface is **~10%**, against ~70% for the shipped analyzers. 3. **A second lock leak exists** — `NodeState` takes `lock (this)` under a `CA2002` suppression whose own comment documents the contract. Recommendation: **neither pure option**, but a staged path reaching the rewrite end state incrementally, gated on migrating the five framework-internal node managers that today make it impossible for the old base to ever freeze. ## Implementation: NodeState now guards its own attributes This removes the prose-only contract in which `NodeState` took `lock(this)` and every external caller was required to take `lock(source)` on the node instance. The code already carried a TODO describing exactly this fix and noting it required updating every external site. - The node self-guards rather than relying on callers. `BaseVariableState` gains a **fully private** `System.Threading.Lock` covering its value fields; `NodeState`'s other collections keep their existing private locks. - All **6** `lock(this)` sites and both `CA2002`/`RCS1059` suppressions are gone. - `Value`, `Timestamp` and `StatusCode` on `BaseVariableState` take the lock too — without that, a direct property write raced an attribute read once the external lock was gone. - **6 of 9** external sites removed. Five were already redundant (`GetReferences`, `GetChildren`, `ReferenceExists` and `SetAreEventsMonitored` guard themselves; `FindMethod` reaches its state via `GetChildren`); the sixth was an attribute read now covered by the node's own lock. - Attribute read/write deliberately take **no** node-wide lock: both dispatch to caller-supplied handlers (`OnReadValue` and siblings) that may take locks of their own, and holding a lock on the node across one gives the node no fixed place in the lock order. - **3 deliberately retained and annotated in code**: two `CreateBrowser` calls, which are not internally synchronized (tracked in #4216), and one in `CustomNodeManager`, whose class is slated for deletion so refactoring its lock would be wasted work. ### No lock is exposed anywhere, to anyone An earlier revision put the attribute lock on `NodeState` as `private protected`, which still published a lock-sharing contract on the inheritance surface. Review pushed back and it is gone: `BaseVariableState` was the only user, so the lock moved there as a plain `private readonly Lock`. There is no member for a derived type to call, in this assembly or any other. `BaseVariableValue` was the last public leak — it handed out the lock guarding its value through a `public Lock` property, so any caller could hold it across a call back into the stack. That property is removed: - Derived value classes (what the source generator emits for every structure variable) synchronize through a `protected EnterLock()` / `ExitLock()` pair. Callback helpers were the first choice, but the generated bodies pass `ref Variant` / `ref StatusCode` / `ref DateTimeUtc`, and `ref` arguments cannot be captured by a lambda. The lock *object* stays private either way. - `NodeStateTemplates` emits the new form. - `ServerInternalData`, the one cross-assembly caller, was reading the lock back off a value it had itself constructed with that lock. It now takes `m_diagnosticsLock` directly. `NodeBrowser.DataLock` remains `protected` and is tracked in #4215: a subclass extending `Next()` legitimately needs its enumeration state atomic with the base browser's, so the fix needs a base-owned acquisition rather than a deletion. ### Migration coverage for the removed lock members None of the removed lock members get an `[Obsolete]` shim, and the migration guide now says why: a shim would have to be `object`-typed to keep old call sites compiling, and on .NET 9+ `lock (o)` on a statically-`object` reference is `Monitor.Enter`, which does **not** interlock with `Lock.Enter()`. It would compile, run, and silently synchronize nothing — strictly worse than a compile error. Re-adding a member to a downstream-implemented interface is also a break in its own right on `net48` / `netstandard2.0`, where there are no default interface methods. Instead, every removed member has a named replacement on the migration path: | Rule | Covers | Replacement it names | |---|---|---| | `UA0024` | `IServerInternal` / `ISession` / `ISubscription` `DiagnosticsLock`, `DiagnosticsWriteLock` | `UpdateServerDiagnostics(...)` / `UpdateDiagnostics(...)`, `ReadServerDiagnostics` / `ReadDiagnostics` | | `UA0025` | `ILocalNode.DataLock`, `Node.DataLock` | a lock the caller owns; the node guards its own state | | `UA0026` | `BaseVariableValue.Lock` | a lock passed to the `BaseVariableValue` constructor | Each rule fires on sources still written against 1.5.378, where the compiler only says a member is missing. `docs/MigrationGuide.md` gains a section per removal with before/after. ### The tests earned their keep The four concurrency tests were landed **first**, against the unmodified code, because removing a synchronization contract cannot be verified by the compiler and the existing `NodeStateHandlerConcurrencyTests` covers a different concern (racing a handler assignment against a write, not reader/writer exclusion). They now run with **no external locking**, which is what demonstrates the node guards itself. They caught two real problems, and one of them was mine: - The `Value`/`StatusCode`/`Timestamp` setters bypassed the new lock — a genuine race. - One test asserted an invariant the design does not offer. Two property setters are two lock acquisitions, so that pair was **never** atomic; it only passed originally because the test held a lock across both. It now uses a single attribute write carrying a whole `DataValue`, which genuinely is atomic and is the path the server uses. A third issue was found and fixed before it shipped: the reader loops gated on `!writer.IsCompleted`, so a reader scheduled after the writer finished performed zero reads — failing two runs in three on `net48`. Converted to `do…while`; now five consecutive green runs. **Verified:** `Stack.State` 116 passed on `net10.0` *and* `net48`; the concurrency category green 5/5 consecutive on `net48`; `Opc.Ua.Types.Tests` 8,456 passed; the server node-manager suite 1,205 passed, including `NodeManagerLifecycleTests` and `AsyncCustomNodeManagerTests` which exercise the changed paths. ## Two corrections to my own published figures Both were found while starting implementation, and both are recorded on #4183. **`ForceDiagnosticsScan()` was overstated.** The analysis claimed the `DiagnosticsWriteLock` getter *"triggers a full address-space diagnostics rescan"*. It is in fact a single flag assignment (`DiagnosticsNodeManager.cs:700-703`) consumed by the read paths and the periodic timer. The defect stands — a side-effecting property getter with a racy write on a synchronisation path — but its cost was misstated. **The contract was 15 sites, not 19.** A naive search matched ten comment and `#pragma` lines that *mention* `lock(source)` while explaining it. The documents now carry a counting command that excludes comment matches. A third finding expanded scope the other way: the `object`-typed lock leak is **repo-wide**, with ten such members across `Opc.Ua.Core`, `Opc.Ua.Types` and `Opc.Ua.Server` — including `Node.DataLock => this` and `ApplicationConfiguration.PropertiesLock => m_properties`, the same defect class as `Subscription.DiagnosticsLock`. ## Caveats stated in the documents - **Nothing in the designs is implemented or benchmarked.** Every performance claim across all seven designs is a design intention, not a measurement. - The larger phases are a **major undertaking against a live plugin API**; the documents say so rather than letting the neatness of the proposals imply otherwise. - The recommended sequencing puts low-risk, self-contained steps first and notes they are **worth doing regardless** of which strategy is eventually chosen. - Round 2 notes the two option designers' cost estimates are **not independent of their assignments**. ## Review guidance The two analyses make factual claims checkable by running the included commands. The design explorations are exploratory and need not be agreed with to merge. The code change is small, test-backed, and independent of which delivery strategy is eventually chosen. Reasonable outcomes include merging as-is, merging only the analyses and the lock fix, or disagreeing with the recommendation while keeping the evidence. --- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: e9c13dd0-a6e3-4ad2-8ad6-1c3fe6323041 Copilot-Session: d18f87e9-2484-44ce-98ce-463ba6cf5f63 |
||
|
Marc SchierandCopilot
|
416d619c41 |
Split the CI matrix across both systems, split the required test gate from the advisory coverage check, and give background work an owner (#4158)
# Description Two changes to how CI is routed and how it reports. ## 1. Split the CI matrix back across both systems Flips both halves of the CI backend switch from `ado` to `actions`, so the workload is shared instead of concentrated on the managed pool. The switch is checked into source in **two places that must always be flipped together**: | File | Setting | Before | After | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | `azure-pipelines.yml` | `parameters.ciBuildBackend` | `ado` | `actions` | | `.github/workflows/buildandtest.yml` | `env.CI_BUILD_BACKEND` | `ado` | `actions` | | Work | GitHub Actions | Azure Pipelines (managed pool) | | --- | --- | --- | | All-TFM solution builds | `build-all-tfm-windows` + `-linux` | two-TFM PR gate (`net10.0`, `net48`) | | Test matrix | ubuntu, every test project | Windows `net48` + `net10.0` fast PR legs | | Native AoT | ubuntu | Schedule/Manual only | | macOS | always (no managed-pool macOS image) | — | ## 2. Split the required gate from the advisory coverage check The coverage gate job was appended to *every* test stage, so `Fast PR test` emitted three sibling checks whose display names collided — `Coverage Release (net10.0)` appeared twice, once for the Windows leg and once for macOS, with nothing to tell them apart: ```text ✓ Coverage Release (net48) 55s ● Coverage Release (net10.0) ○ Coverage Release (net10.0) ``` That job also fused two unrelated concerns: whether the tests passed (which must block a merge) and whether coverage met its thresholds (which should not — the `net10.0` leg had `enforceCoverage: true`, so a coverage dip blocked merges). Both concerns now get a stage of their own, mirrored in both CI systems: | Concern | Azure Pipelines | GitHub Actions | In the branch ruleset? | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Every test passed | **`Tests passed`** stage | **`build-and-test summary`** job | **Yes — required** | | Coverage meets thresholds | **`Code coverage`** stage | **`code coverage`** job | **No — advisory** | The coverage check reports a clean failure when the thresholds are missed, so the miss is visible, but it never blocks the merge. Coverage is now merged **once** across every leg of the run instead of once per leg, which also removes the `enforceCoverage` / `publishCoverage` "exactly one invocation may set this" parameters. Neither check re-runs any tests — the previous design re-ran the whole suite in one job with the collector attached, which serialised a suite that is deliberately fanned out and always exceeded the stage timeout. ### Coverage checks now exist in GitHub Actions `build-and-test` already ran with `--collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"` and uploaded the fragments, but nothing ever merged or evaluated them. It now runs the same `check-coverage.ps1` against the same `coverage-thresholds.json` as Azure. Since `CI_BUILD_BACKEND` defaults to `actions`, that ubuntu matrix — which runs *every* test project — is the fullest coverage signal in the repository. ### Reporting the numbers `check-coverage.ps1` gained `-SummaryPath`, rendering a markdown report that both systems surface: - **GitHub Actions** — appended to the job summary and upserted as a single **sticky pull-request comment**, updated in place on each run. Threshold misses also appear as `::error::` annotations. - **Azure Pipelines** — attached to the build summary via `##vso[task.uploadsummary]`. The report is a pass/fail table of the project floor, patch coverage and baseline delta, with the uncovered changed lines listed by file in a collapsible block. Rendered example: > ## Code coverage > > ❌ **Coverage gate failed.** This check is advisory and does not block the merge. > > | Check | Result | Threshold | > | --- | --- | --- | > | ✅ Project line rate | **72.10%** (40 731/56 496 lines) | >= 70.00% | > | ❌ Patch coverage | **0.00%** (0/1 changed lines) | >= 75.00% | The comment is fork-safe: a `pull_request` from a fork gets a read-only token regardless of the `permissions:` block, so it degrades to the job summary alone. The sticky comment uses `actions/github-script` rather than a community action, keeping this workflow on first-party actions only. ## Notable correctness details These were found and fixed during review, and are the parts most worth a second pair of eyes: - **`dependencies.<stage>.result` resolves at *stage* scope only.** At job scope `dependencies` refers to other jobs of the same stage, so reading stage results from a jobs template would have silently returned empty and the gate would have passed everything. `gate.yml` and `coverage.yml` are therefore **stage** templates that derive their own `dependsOn` from the same stage list they evaluate, so the two can never drift apart. An unresolved result is a hard error. - **Both rollups run on `not(canceled())` / `always()`**, not on success. A check that reports **skipped** is treated by GitHub as **satisfied**, so a required check that skips when its dependency fails would wave a red build straight through. - **`get-matrix.ps1` used to emit an empty matrix on a discovery miss.** The downstream job is then skipped, a skipped job rolls up as a *succeeded* stage, and the gate would have approved a run that executed no tests. It now fails, with an `-AllowEmpty` opt-out. - **Zero coverage reports used to be a green advisory check**, which would hide a broken collector indefinitely. Both systems now distinguish "the tests never ran" (warning) from "the tests ran and published nothing" (error). - The gate reads stage-level results rather than enumerating matrix-generated job names, which change whenever a test project or agent is added. ## Test-host hang and the reconnect defect behind it — both fixed Flipping `CI_BUILD_BACKEND` to `actions` started exercising the ubuntu matrix, which `master` never runs, and it immediately surfaced two real defects. **1. The test host hung for ten minutes.** `Assert.ThrowsAsync` blocks the calling thread with no timeout, and these tests drive a *fake clock* from that same thread — so once the reconnect parked on a fake-clock timer, nothing could ever advance it. NUnit sat in `WaitForCompletion` until `--blame-hang-timeout` killed the host, aborting the run at 3902 of 4238 tests and taking every other test in the assembly down with it. A hang dump named the culprit exactly. Replaced with an awaited, bounded `AssertThrowsAsync` helper (the repo's own rules forbid sync over async). The run now completes in **~1m29s** with all tests executed. **2. A budget-aware reconnect never returned.** With the hang gone, two tests failed with `Expected ServiceResultException but got TimeoutException`. `dumpasync` on a hang dump gave the whole chain: ``` ReconnectAsyncWithBudgetShrinksDelayToFitRemainingAsync → AssertThrowsAsync → ClientChannelManager.ReconnectAsync → ClientChannelManager.ReconnectLeaseAsync → ClientChannelManager.SwapFaultedEntryAsync ← parked here ``` `master` (via #4128) added `IsTerminalReconnectRace` so a reconnect that loses a race against a concurrent close recovers on a freshly swapped entry. The predicate only asks whether the entry ended up `Closed`/`Faulted` with `BadSecureChannelClosed` — which is *also* exactly how a reconnect ends when the caller's retry budget or the reconnect policy is deliberately exhausted. So a budget-exhausted reconnect was misread as a race: the manager swapped the entry and started a **second, unbudgeted** cycle, waiting out the swap back-off first. `ReconnectAsync(channel, budget)` therefore could not return within its budget, and under a fake clock it never returned at all. The fix requires the budget to have room left before treating a terminal failure as a race: ```csharp return !ct.IsCancellationRequested && !budget.IsExhausted && sre.StatusCode == StatusCodes.BadSecureChannelClosed && entry.State is ChannelState.Closed or ChannelState.Faulted; ``` The parameterless `ReconnectAsync(channel, ct)` overload passes an unlimited budget, so genuine race recovery is unchanged. Verified locally: Core 4152, Client 2122 and Sessions 776 tests all pass, and the full GitHub Actions PR run is green across 56 jobs. Two smaller fixes came along the way, neither weakening an assertion: - `ObservableFakeTimeProvider` waiters made **relative** ("N more timers from now") rather than absolute ("the Nth timer of the run"). Absolute numbering let an earlier reconnect consume the slots, so a waiter completed before the awaited timer existed and `Advance()` fired nothing. - The raw worker thread in `NodeStateHandlerConcurrencyTests` was a **foreground** thread whose stop flag was read without a barrier and set only on the success path — a failed assertion leaked a spinning thread that pins the process at exit. Now background, `Volatile`, stopped in a `finally`, joined with a bound. ## Background work now has an owner The reconnect hang above was one symptom of a pattern the codebase had **26 times** across seven assemblies: a bare `_ = Task.Run(...)`. Each one handed work to the thread pool and forgot it — nothing observed the exception if it threw, nothing bounded how many ran at once, and disposal raced them, so a component could finish tearing itself down while work it started was still touching its fields. Two of those sites already carried a standing `// TODO: Await the task completion in shutdown`. `BackgroundTaskScope` (in `Opc.Ua.Types`) gives them an owner: schedule with `Run`, drain with `DisposeAsync`, or signal-only with `Dispose` where the owner's teardown is synchronous and awaiting would be sync over async. `Run` never blocks and never throws — which matters, because most of these call sites went to the thread pool precisely to escape a lock they were holding. 11 unit tests cover drain, cancellation, exception observation, the concurrency cap, post-shutdown rejection and idempotent disposal. Two of the fixes were more than re-wiring: - **`SessionManager` / `SubscriptionManager` loops were structurally unawaitable.** Both return `ValueTask`, so `Task.Factory.StartNew(() => ...)` handed back a `Task<ValueTask>` that completes at the first yield. Storing it would not have helped — awaiting it would only have awaited the *scheduling*. Both now go through `AsTask().Unwrap()`, matching the neighbouring `StartConditionRefreshWorker`. - **`ChannelAsyncOperation` was swallowing subscriber exceptions.** Its `doNotBlock` branch had no try/catch while the inline branch beside it did. It is per-operation with no owner to hang a drain on, so it gained the missing handler rather than a scope. The Kubernetes readiness endpoint keeps a purpose-built semaphore instead: an unauthenticated endpoint needs a hard cap on concurrent handlers, not just an owner. ### ⚠️ Breaking: `ISessionManager.Shutdown()` is removed Replaced by `ShutdownAsync(CancellationToken)`. There is no correct synchronous way to wait for the session monitor loop, so leaving the overload would only have preserved the race. This mirrors `ISubscriptionManager`, which already had `ShutdownAsync`. Migration notes are in `docs/MigrationGuide.md`; only one in-repo implementer existed. Also converted the injected `object partitionLock` shared by `LogicalSubscription` and `CompositeMonitoredItemCollection` to `System.Threading.Lock`, per the repo rule. ## Patch coverage now scales with the size of the patch A flat floor over changed lines punishes small changes for arithmetic: two uncovered lines in a four-line fix reads as 50 % and failed an 80/5 floor — which is exactly how this branch earned a red coverage check for a four-line predicate change. A check that fires on changes nobody considers undertested is one people learn to ignore. | Coverable changed lines | Floor | Below it | | --- | --- | --- | | 1 – 10 | 50 % | warning, still passes | | 11 – 100 | 60 % | warning, still passes | | more than 100 | 75 % | **failure** | Only changes past the last band can fail. Below it the author still gets a warning naming the uncovered lines. Bands live in `patch.bands` in `coverage-thresholds.json` and each carries its own `enforced` flag. Verified end-to-end against synthetic repositories at every boundary. ## Codecov is back, as reporting Dropped in #4122 when the in-pipeline gate replaced it. Keeping the gate was right, but dropping Codecov also lost the PR comment, the file-by-file diff view and the trend. It returns with both statuses `informational: true` — two gates with two sets of thresholds would eventually disagree, and `coverage-thresholds.json` stays the single source of truth. The upload is switchable and can never fail a build: `enableCodecov` (Azure) and `ENABLE_CODECOV` (Actions), both defaulting on, both skipped when `CODECOV_TOKEN` is absent as on fork PRs. Each system uploads the single merged report it already builds, under its own flag. The old `codecov.io/bash` uploader was sunset, so Azure uses the current CLI. ## Follow-up actions for maintainers 1. **Update the branch ruleset.** The per-leg `Coverage Release (…)` checks are gone. Azure reports checks as `<pipeline> (<stage> <job>)`, so the exact names are: | Check | Require? | | --- | --- | | `OPCFoundation.UA-.NETStandard (Tests passed Verify stage results)` | **yes** | | `build-and-test summary` | **yes** (already required) | | `OPCFoundation.UA-.NETStandard (Code coverage Merge and evaluate)` | no | | `code coverage` | no | 2. **Re-calibrate the thresholds.** `coverage-thresholds.json` is still seeded from the last Codecov reading (73.61 %). The two systems now report *different* numbers by design — Actions merges every project on ubuntu, Azure only the Windows fast-PR legs, and scheduled runs read higher still because the Debug / .NET 8 / .NET 9 / netstandard stages also contribute. Re-seed from the GitHub Actions figure. 3. **Note:** a failed advisory coverage stage still turns the whole Azure run red, which the README build badge reflects on `master`. That follows from wanting a visible red X on a threshold miss; say the word if you would rather it were a warning. 4. **The Azure agent pool is the slowest thing here.** Several runs on this PR sat queued for hours, and one build failed with `Insufficient system resources` while writing an XML doc file — an agent exhaustion error, not a code error. It passed on re-run. Worth raising against the `netstandard` Managed DevOps Pool capacity separately. ## Related Issues _No tracking issue; this is CI infrastructure work requested directly. It builds on the switch introduced in #4122._ ## Checklist - [x] I have signed the [CLA](https://opcfoundation.org/license/cla/ContributorLicenseAgreementv1.0.pdf) and read the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) doc. - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works and increased code coverage. - No product code changed, so there are no unit tests to add. The new logic was verified with purpose-built harnesses instead: - `check-coverage.ps1` run for real against a merged Cobertura report on all three paths — pass, threshold failure, and patch coverage with uncovered changed lines (a scratch commit adding an uncovered method was correctly resolved to `DataTypeException.cs:193`, reported 0 % patch coverage and exited 1). - The gate's accept/reject logic dry-run over `Succeeded` / `SucceededWithIssues` / `Skipped` / empty / `Failed` / `Canceled` — 6/6 correct. - `get-matrix.ps1` exit codes verified in clean processes: empty → 1, normal → 0, `-AllowEmpty` → 0. - All five pipeline/workflow files parse; both PowerShell scripts parse. - Action versions checked against the GitHub API and pinned to current majors. - [x] I have added all necessary documentation. - Rewrote the coverage section of `docs/DeveloperGuide.md` as *Required checks and coverage*, covering which checks belong in the ruleset and which must not, how coverage is measured, where the numbers appear, and why the two systems disagree. Corrected the stale "BLOCKS" wording in `coverage-thresholds.json`. - [x] I have verified that my changes do not introduce (new) build or analyzer warnings. - CI YAML, two PowerShell scripts and documentation only; no compilation involved. - [x] I ran **all** tests locally using the **UA.slnx** solution against at least .net **framework** and .net **10**, and all passed. - Not applicable — no product code changed. `Opc.Ua.Core.Schema.Tests` was run repeatedly on net10.0 (119 passed) to generate the real Cobertura fragments used to validate the gate. - [ ] I fixed **all** failing and flaky tests in the CI pipelines and **all** CodeQL warnings. - [x] I have addressed **all** PR feedback received. - Feedback on the path-relevance diff (now a merge-base diff) and the target-framework numbering in `docs/DeveloperGuide.md` is fixed in `15b8e38df`. - A review pass over the gate/coverage split produced the four correctness fixes listed above, in `863eefc4d`. --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 26aa55a2-5731-4a4c-b61c-df2f7a785eca |
||
|
Marc SchierandCopilot
|
168b3de353 |
Replace the RequestManager AsyncLocal guard with an explicit operation context (#4163)
# Description `RequestManager` tracked whether the calling flow was serving a Client request in a `private readonly AsyncLocal<bool> m_inServiceDispatch`. It was set by a `StandardServer.ProcessRequestAsync` override and read by `NodeManagerLifecycle`, so that a lifecycle operation (`AddAsync` / `ReloadAsync` / `RemoveAsync`) started from inside a request fails fast with `InvalidOperationException` instead of draining — and therefore waiting for — its own request. Two problems with that mechanism, raised in review of #4093: 1. An `AsyncLocal<T>` written inside an `async` method never flows back to the caller that awaited it, so every scope had to chain to the previous value by hand and restore it on dispose. Subtle, and easy to get wrong when a new entry point is added. 2. Ambient state is invisible at the call site, so the lifetime of the mark could not be reasoned about from the code that depended on it — especially once work is handed to a background task. `RequestManager` also had no business carrying ambient state on behalf of a different subsystem; its job is tracking requests for the drain. ## What changed The guard is now an **exact identity lookup** against the request registry `RequestManager` already maintains, and the operation is threaded **explicitly**: * **`RequestManager`** — `internal bool IsExecutingRequest(IOperationContext?)` performs a reference-identity lookup against `m_requests` under the existing `m_requestsLock`. `m_inServiceDispatch`, `EnterServiceDispatchScope()`, the nested `ServiceDispatchScope` class and the flag-based `IsExecutingRequest` property are gone. * **`StandardServer`** — the `ProcessRequestAsync` override is removed; it existed only to open the dispatch scope. * **`INodeManagerLifecycle`** — every member (`AddAsync` ×2 factory kinds, `ReloadAsync` ×2, `RemoveAsync`) now takes the caller's `IOperationContext?` directly, ahead of `CancellationToken ct = default`. No overloads and no parallel signature are kept: the interface is new in 2.0 and outside the 1.5.378 compatibility rule, so call sites state their context explicitly or pass `null`. * **`HostedNodeManagerLifecycle`** and **`RuntimeNodeSetLifecycleExtensions`** thread the argument through; `AddRuntimeNodeSetAsync` / `ReloadRuntimeNodeSetAsync` remain single methods. * **`SystemContextOperationExtensions.GetOperationContext(this ISystemContext)`** (new, `Opc.Ua.Core`) lets a NodeManager or Method callback hand over the operation it already received without downcasting. It switches on `SessionSystemContext` and `SystemContext`, the two independent roots every context derives from. No new interface is introduced: casting the context to `IOperationContext` would not do, because a context implements that by delegating to the operation it was created for, so the cast yields the context rather than the operation. * **`NodeManagerLifecycle.EnsureNotRequestCallback`** no longer consults `ServerState`. The previous `CurrentState == Running` predicate could let a genuinely re-entrant call slip past while the server was shutting down; the request registry answers exactly in every state. A NodeManager or Method callback now reads: ```csharp await m_lifecycle.ReloadAsync(m_registration, replacement, context.GetOperationContext(), ct); ``` and a control-plane caller (hosted service, DI consumer) passes `null`. ## Behaviour Unchanged for the case the guard exists to catch: a lifecycle call made on behalf of an executing request is still rejected up front with the same `InvalidOperationException` and the same message. Two deliberate differences: * **Improvement** — an internal `OperationContext` that was never enrolled as a Client request is now correctly allowed through. The boolean flag could not distinguish it from a real request. * **Accepted trade-off** — a caller inside a request that passes no operation is no longer detected at entry and falls back to the pre-existing bounded `RequestManager.RequestDrainTimeout`, which already covered any request that bypassed the service pipeline. Automatic detection for an uncooperative caller inherently requires ambient state, which is exactly what this change removes. Documented in `docs/NodeManagers.md`. ## Alternatives considered and rejected | Alternative | Why rejected | | --- | --- | | Delete the guard, rely only on `RequestDrainTimeout` | Turns a clear immediate error into a multi-minute hang. | | Infer the caller from the `CancellationToken` it passes | Works only for the exact request token, breaks on linked tokens; ambient magic of a different kind. | | In-flight callback counter on `MasterNodeManager` | False positives: rejects legitimate control-plane calls whenever any request is concurrently dispatching. | | Defer the drain to a background task so re-entrancy cannot deadlock | The drains are woven into transactional commit / rollback and binding reconciliation; deferring them breaks the transactional guarantees. | | `Activity.Current` / `ThreadLocal` | The same ambient magic the issue asks to remove. | ## Testing * `RequestManagerTests` — the three `EnterServiceDispatchScope` tests are replaced by coverage for `IsExecutingRequest(context)`: null, never-registered, only-while-scope-open, visible across an `await` and a background `Task.Run`, and two concurrently executing requests not confusing each other. * `NodeManagerLifecycleTests` — rejection from an executing request for Add / Reload / Remove without invoking the factory, acceptance for a context that is not an executing request, acceptance once the request has completed, and the full callback shape (`ServerSystemContext.Copy(operation)` → `GetOperationContext()` → rejected). * `HostedNodeManagerLifecycleTests` — forwarding tests for the caller-context argument on all five members. * `tests/Opc.Ua.Core.Tests/Stack/State/SystemContextOperationExtensionsTests.cs` (new) — `GetOperationContext` across both context roots and the null-argument guard. ## Related Issues - Fixes #4149 ## Checklist - [x] I have signed the [CLA](https://opcfoundation.org/license/cla/ContributorLicenseAgreementv1.0.pdf) and read the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) doc. - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works and increased code coverage. - [x] I have added all necessary documentation. - [x] I have verified that my changes do not introduce (new) build or analyzer warnings. - [x] I ran **all** tests locally using the **UA.slnx** solution against at least .net **framework** and .net **10**, and all passed. - [ ] I fixed **all** failing and flaky tests in the CI pipelines and **all** CodeQL warnings. - [ ] I have addressed **all** PR feedback received. --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 14402d11-e540-4faa-a5cd-94881bd7ce85 |
||
|
Marc Schier
|
7cec2d614d | Move repository files to the consolidated layout |