3 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
romanett	d623007a3f	Remove the Azure Pipelines CI and publishing definitions from master (#4575) ... # Description Removes the Azure Pipelines CI and package-publishing definitions from `master`. GitHub Actions already owns all CI and package publishing for `master`, but pushes to `master` still queued the Azure definitions. They duplicated the Actions work and posted failing checks, for example [`Nuget Preview (Push Nuget Preview Pack Nugets Debug)`](https://github.com/OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard/runs/109065914524) on `19dc504c5`. ## Removed - `azure-pipelines.yml`, `azure-pipelines-preview.yml` - `.azurepipelines/` templates: `ci.yml`, `coverage.yml`, `preview.yml`, `sample-ha-longhaul.yml`, `sln.yml`, `test.yml`, `test-aot.yml` - Helpers only those templates used: `get-matrix.ps1`, `get-root.ps1`, `evaluate-test-results.ps1` - `TrxGateScriptTests`: it tested only `evaluate-test-results.ps1`. The Actions equivalent, `.github/scripts/get-test-verdict.ps1`, keeps its own `CiTestVerdictTests`. ## Kept **OneFuzz:** `.azurepipelines/onefuzz.yml` stays. Submitting to the internal OneFuzz service needs the Azure DevOps-only `onefuzz-task`, which has no GitHub Actions equivalent. The pipeline has no push, PR or schedule trigger, so it never runs on `master` pushes. The public drop build keeps running in the GitHub `fuzz-public-drop` job. **Scripts GitHub Actions still invokes:** these stay in `.azurepipelines/`, so every workflow path and `release.yml`'s candidate-bound checkout keep working. Only `generate-slnx.ps1` changes, and only its comment. | Script | Used by | | --- | --- | | `set-version.ps1` | buildandtest, nightly, nuget-publish, docker-image, stress / stability / long-haul, `run-dotnet-tests` action | | `generate-slnx.ps1`, `signlist{Debug,Release}.txt`, `validate-source-generator-packages.ps1` (+ `expected-packages.txt`) | nuget-publish | | `package-version-policy.ps1`, `validate-nuget-package-set.ps1`, `validate-preview-package-ordering.ps1`, `assert-published-packages-match.ps1` | nuget-publish, release | | `check-coverage.ps1` | buildandtest, nightly | | `validate-migration-plugin.ps1` | buildandtest | I didn't rename the directory on purpose. `release.yml` checks out the candidate commit and runs `./.azurepipelines/package-version-policy.ps1` from it, so moving the scripts would break promotion of any candidate built before the move. ## Docs and comments - `UA.slnx` drops the deleted files. - `codecov.yml`, `coverage-thresholds.json`, `targets.props`, the Redundancy sample test comments, the `.github` scripts and workflows, `CONTRIBUTING.md`, `docs/` and `fuzzing/` no longer describe Azure as running on `master` (`/azp run`, the `azure` Codecov flag, "the Azure gate", the Azure long-haul and AoT legs). - In the Developer Guide, the "Triggering a pipeline run" and "Migration status" sections are replaced by "Pull requests from outside contributors" and "Azure Pipelines on other branches". - The new section names `onefuzz.yml` as the one remaining Azure definition. - It keeps the warning that the `Release` ruleset's Azure required check must be lifted before cutting a new `release/2.<minor>` branch. - `master` is merged in, including the #4555 docs rewrite. Its new `docs/RedundancySampleTests.md` needed the Azure references removed again. `docs/README.md` already had none. ## Reviewer notes - **Azure DevOps side (admin action, not in this PR):** the definitions are configured in the Azure DevOps portal. With the YAML gone, `master` pushes give the CI and preview definitions nothing to run. Disabling definition 14's push trigger/schedule, definition 16's build-completion trigger, and the stale definition 13 stops any residual "file not found" runs. Leave the OneFuzz definition enabled. - `master378`, the 1.x `release/*` lines and the frozen `release/2.0.0` keep their own `azure-pipelines.yml`. This PR only touches `master`. ## Related Issues - Follow-up to #4513 (GitHub Actions for CI and nightly). ## Checklist - [ ] I have signed the [CLA](https://opcfoundation.org/license/cla/ContributorLicenseAgreementv1.0.pdf) and read the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) doc. - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works and increased code coverage. - [x] I have added all necessary documentation. - [ ] I have verified that my changes do not introduce (new) build or analyzer warnings. - [ ] I ran **all** tests locally using the **UA.slnx** solution against at least .net **framework** and .net **10**, and all passed. - [ ] I fixed **all** failing and flaky tests in the CI pipelines and **all** CodeQL warnings. - [ ] I have addressed **all** PR feedback received. This PR removes a test and adds none. Locally, at `9b00da817`, the full `Opc.Ua.Tools.Tests` suite passed on net10.0: 884 passed, 1 skipped. The later commits (OneFuzz restore, merge with `master`) touch only YAML and docs. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-29 07:44:36 +02:00
Marc Schier	416d619c41	Split the CI matrix across both systems, split the required test gate from the advisory coverage check, and give background work an owner (#4158) ... # Description Two changes to how CI is routed and how it reports. ## 1. Split the CI matrix back across both systems Flips both halves of the CI backend switch from `ado` to `actions`, so the workload is shared instead of concentrated on the managed pool. The switch is checked into source in **two places that must always be flipped together**: | File | Setting | Before | After | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | `azure-pipelines.yml` | `parameters.ciBuildBackend` | `ado` | `actions` | | `.github/workflows/buildandtest.yml` | `env.CI_BUILD_BACKEND` | `ado` | `actions` | | Work | GitHub Actions | Azure Pipelines (managed pool) | | --- | --- | --- | | All-TFM solution builds | `build-all-tfm-windows` + `-linux` | two-TFM PR gate (`net10.0`, `net48`) | | Test matrix | ubuntu, every test project | Windows `net48` + `net10.0` fast PR legs | | Native AoT | ubuntu | Schedule/Manual only | | macOS | always (no managed-pool macOS image) | — | ## 2. Split the required gate from the advisory coverage check The coverage gate job was appended to *every* test stage, so `Fast PR test` emitted three sibling checks whose display names collided — `Coverage Release (net10.0)` appeared twice, once for the Windows leg and once for macOS, with nothing to tell them apart: ```text ✓ Coverage Release (net48) 55s ● Coverage Release (net10.0) ○ Coverage Release (net10.0) ``` That job also fused two unrelated concerns: whether the tests passed (which must block a merge) and whether coverage met its thresholds (which should not — the `net10.0` leg had `enforceCoverage: true`, so a coverage dip blocked merges). Both concerns now get a stage of their own, mirrored in both CI systems: | Concern | Azure Pipelines | GitHub Actions | In the branch ruleset? | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Every test passed | **`Tests passed`** stage | **`build-and-test summary`** job | **Yes — required** | | Coverage meets thresholds | **`Code coverage`** stage | **`code coverage`** job | **No — advisory** | The coverage check reports a clean failure when the thresholds are missed, so the miss is visible, but it never blocks the merge. Coverage is now merged **once** across every leg of the run instead of once per leg, which also removes the `enforceCoverage` / `publishCoverage` "exactly one invocation may set this" parameters. Neither check re-runs any tests — the previous design re-ran the whole suite in one job with the collector attached, which serialised a suite that is deliberately fanned out and always exceeded the stage timeout. ### Coverage checks now exist in GitHub Actions `build-and-test` already ran with `--collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"` and uploaded the fragments, but nothing ever merged or evaluated them. It now runs the same `check-coverage.ps1` against the same `coverage-thresholds.json` as Azure. Since `CI_BUILD_BACKEND` defaults to `actions`, that ubuntu matrix — which runs *every* test project — is the fullest coverage signal in the repository. ### Reporting the numbers `check-coverage.ps1` gained `-SummaryPath`, rendering a markdown report that both systems surface: - **GitHub Actions** — appended to the job summary and upserted as a single **sticky pull-request comment**, updated in place on each run. Threshold misses also appear as `::error::` annotations. - **Azure Pipelines** — attached to the build summary via `##vso[task.uploadsummary]`. The report is a pass/fail table of the project floor, patch coverage and baseline delta, with the uncovered changed lines listed by file in a collapsible block. Rendered example: > ## Code coverage > > ❌ **Coverage gate failed.** This check is advisory and does not block the merge. > > | Check | Result | Threshold | > | --- | --- | --- | > | ✅ Project line rate | **72.10%** (40 731/56 496 lines) | >= 70.00% | > | ❌ Patch coverage | **0.00%** (0/1 changed lines) | >= 75.00% | The comment is fork-safe: a `pull_request` from a fork gets a read-only token regardless of the `permissions:` block, so it degrades to the job summary alone. The sticky comment uses `actions/github-script` rather than a community action, keeping this workflow on first-party actions only. ## Notable correctness details These were found and fixed during review, and are the parts most worth a second pair of eyes: - **`dependencies.<stage>.result` resolves at *stage* scope only.** At job scope `dependencies` refers to other jobs of the same stage, so reading stage results from a jobs template would have silently returned empty and the gate would have passed everything. `gate.yml` and `coverage.yml` are therefore **stage** templates that derive their own `dependsOn` from the same stage list they evaluate, so the two can never drift apart. An unresolved result is a hard error. - **Both rollups run on `not(canceled())` / `always()`**, not on success. A check that reports **skipped** is treated by GitHub as **satisfied**, so a required check that skips when its dependency fails would wave a red build straight through. - **`get-matrix.ps1` used to emit an empty matrix on a discovery miss.** The downstream job is then skipped, a skipped job rolls up as a *succeeded* stage, and the gate would have approved a run that executed no tests. It now fails, with an `-AllowEmpty` opt-out. - **Zero coverage reports used to be a green advisory check**, which would hide a broken collector indefinitely. Both systems now distinguish "the tests never ran" (warning) from "the tests ran and published nothing" (error). - The gate reads stage-level results rather than enumerating matrix-generated job names, which change whenever a test project or agent is added. ## Test-host hang and the reconnect defect behind it — both fixed Flipping `CI_BUILD_BACKEND` to `actions` started exercising the ubuntu matrix, which `master` never runs, and it immediately surfaced two real defects. **1. The test host hung for ten minutes.** `Assert.ThrowsAsync` blocks the calling thread with no timeout, and these tests drive a *fake clock* from that same thread — so once the reconnect parked on a fake-clock timer, nothing could ever advance it. NUnit sat in `WaitForCompletion` until `--blame-hang-timeout` killed the host, aborting the run at 3902 of 4238 tests and taking every other test in the assembly down with it. A hang dump named the culprit exactly. Replaced with an awaited, bounded `AssertThrowsAsync` helper (the repo's own rules forbid sync over async). The run now completes in **~1m29s** with all tests executed. **2. A budget-aware reconnect never returned.** With the hang gone, two tests failed with `Expected ServiceResultException but got TimeoutException`. `dumpasync` on a hang dump gave the whole chain: ``` ReconnectAsyncWithBudgetShrinksDelayToFitRemainingAsync → AssertThrowsAsync → ClientChannelManager.ReconnectAsync → ClientChannelManager.ReconnectLeaseAsync → ClientChannelManager.SwapFaultedEntryAsync ← parked here ``` `master` (via #4128) added `IsTerminalReconnectRace` so a reconnect that loses a race against a concurrent close recovers on a freshly swapped entry. The predicate only asks whether the entry ended up `Closed`/`Faulted` with `BadSecureChannelClosed` — which is *also* exactly how a reconnect ends when the caller's retry budget or the reconnect policy is deliberately exhausted. So a budget-exhausted reconnect was misread as a race: the manager swapped the entry and started a **second, unbudgeted** cycle, waiting out the swap back-off first. `ReconnectAsync(channel, budget)` therefore could not return within its budget, and under a fake clock it never returned at all. The fix requires the budget to have room left before treating a terminal failure as a race: ```csharp return !ct.IsCancellationRequested && !budget.IsExhausted && sre.StatusCode == StatusCodes.BadSecureChannelClosed && entry.State is ChannelState.Closed or ChannelState.Faulted; ``` The parameterless `ReconnectAsync(channel, ct)` overload passes an unlimited budget, so genuine race recovery is unchanged. Verified locally: Core 4152, Client 2122 and Sessions 776 tests all pass, and the full GitHub Actions PR run is green across 56 jobs. Two smaller fixes came along the way, neither weakening an assertion: - `ObservableFakeTimeProvider` waiters made **relative** ("N more timers from now") rather than absolute ("the Nth timer of the run"). Absolute numbering let an earlier reconnect consume the slots, so a waiter completed before the awaited timer existed and `Advance()` fired nothing. - The raw worker thread in `NodeStateHandlerConcurrencyTests` was a **foreground** thread whose stop flag was read without a barrier and set only on the success path — a failed assertion leaked a spinning thread that pins the process at exit. Now background, `Volatile`, stopped in a `finally`, joined with a bound. ## Background work now has an owner The reconnect hang above was one symptom of a pattern the codebase had **26 times** across seven assemblies: a bare `_ = Task.Run(...)`. Each one handed work to the thread pool and forgot it — nothing observed the exception if it threw, nothing bounded how many ran at once, and disposal raced them, so a component could finish tearing itself down while work it started was still touching its fields. Two of those sites already carried a standing `// TODO: Await the task completion in shutdown`. `BackgroundTaskScope` (in `Opc.Ua.Types`) gives them an owner: schedule with `Run`, drain with `DisposeAsync`, or signal-only with `Dispose` where the owner's teardown is synchronous and awaiting would be sync over async. `Run` never blocks and never throws — which matters, because most of these call sites went to the thread pool precisely to escape a lock they were holding. 11 unit tests cover drain, cancellation, exception observation, the concurrency cap, post-shutdown rejection and idempotent disposal. Two of the fixes were more than re-wiring: - **`SessionManager` / `SubscriptionManager` loops were structurally unawaitable.** Both return `ValueTask`, so `Task.Factory.StartNew(() => ...)` handed back a `Task<ValueTask>` that completes at the first yield. Storing it would not have helped — awaiting it would only have awaited the *scheduling*. Both now go through `AsTask().Unwrap()`, matching the neighbouring `StartConditionRefreshWorker`. - **`ChannelAsyncOperation` was swallowing subscriber exceptions.** Its `doNotBlock` branch had no try/catch while the inline branch beside it did. It is per-operation with no owner to hang a drain on, so it gained the missing handler rather than a scope. The Kubernetes readiness endpoint keeps a purpose-built semaphore instead: an unauthenticated endpoint needs a hard cap on concurrent handlers, not just an owner. ### ⚠️ Breaking: `ISessionManager.Shutdown()` is removed Replaced by `ShutdownAsync(CancellationToken)`. There is no correct synchronous way to wait for the session monitor loop, so leaving the overload would only have preserved the race. This mirrors `ISubscriptionManager`, which already had `ShutdownAsync`. Migration notes are in `docs/MigrationGuide.md`; only one in-repo implementer existed. Also converted the injected `object partitionLock` shared by `LogicalSubscription` and `CompositeMonitoredItemCollection` to `System.Threading.Lock`, per the repo rule. ## Patch coverage now scales with the size of the patch A flat floor over changed lines punishes small changes for arithmetic: two uncovered lines in a four-line fix reads as 50 % and failed an 80/5 floor — which is exactly how this branch earned a red coverage check for a four-line predicate change. A check that fires on changes nobody considers undertested is one people learn to ignore. | Coverable changed lines | Floor | Below it | | --- | --- | --- | | 1 – 10 | 50 % | warning, still passes | | 11 – 100 | 60 % | warning, still passes | | more than 100 | 75 % | **failure** | Only changes past the last band can fail. Below it the author still gets a warning naming the uncovered lines. Bands live in `patch.bands` in `coverage-thresholds.json` and each carries its own `enforced` flag. Verified end-to-end against synthetic repositories at every boundary. ## Codecov is back, as reporting Dropped in #4122 when the in-pipeline gate replaced it. Keeping the gate was right, but dropping Codecov also lost the PR comment, the file-by-file diff view and the trend. It returns with both statuses `informational: true` — two gates with two sets of thresholds would eventually disagree, and `coverage-thresholds.json` stays the single source of truth. The upload is switchable and can never fail a build: `enableCodecov` (Azure) and `ENABLE_CODECOV` (Actions), both defaulting on, both skipped when `CODECOV_TOKEN` is absent as on fork PRs. Each system uploads the single merged report it already builds, under its own flag. The old `codecov.io/bash` uploader was sunset, so Azure uses the current CLI. ## Follow-up actions for maintainers 1. **Update the branch ruleset.** The per-leg `Coverage Release (…)` checks are gone. Azure reports checks as `<pipeline> (<stage> <job>)`, so the exact names are: | Check | Require? | | --- | --- | | `OPCFoundation.UA-.NETStandard (Tests passed Verify stage results)` | **yes** | | `build-and-test summary` | **yes** (already required) | | `OPCFoundation.UA-.NETStandard (Code coverage Merge and evaluate)` | no | | `code coverage` | no | 2. **Re-calibrate the thresholds.** `coverage-thresholds.json` is still seeded from the last Codecov reading (73.61 %). The two systems now report *different* numbers by design — Actions merges every project on ubuntu, Azure only the Windows fast-PR legs, and scheduled runs read higher still because the Debug / .NET 8 / .NET 9 / netstandard stages also contribute. Re-seed from the GitHub Actions figure. 3. **Note:** a failed advisory coverage stage still turns the whole Azure run red, which the README build badge reflects on `master`. That follows from wanting a visible red X on a threshold miss; say the word if you would rather it were a warning. 4. **The Azure agent pool is the slowest thing here.** Several runs on this PR sat queued for hours, and one build failed with `Insufficient system resources` while writing an XML doc file — an agent exhaustion error, not a code error. It passed on re-run. Worth raising against the `netstandard` Managed DevOps Pool capacity separately. ## Related Issues _No tracking issue; this is CI infrastructure work requested directly. It builds on the switch introduced in #4122._ ## Checklist - [x] I have signed the [CLA](https://opcfoundation.org/license/cla/ContributorLicenseAgreementv1.0.pdf) and read the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) doc. - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works and increased code coverage. - No product code changed, so there are no unit tests to add. The new logic was verified with purpose-built harnesses instead: - `check-coverage.ps1` run for real against a merged Cobertura report on all three paths — pass, threshold failure, and patch coverage with uncovered changed lines (a scratch commit adding an uncovered method was correctly resolved to `DataTypeException.cs:193`, reported 0 % patch coverage and exited 1). - The gate's accept/reject logic dry-run over `Succeeded` / `SucceededWithIssues` / `Skipped` / empty / `Failed` / `Canceled` — 6/6 correct. - `get-matrix.ps1` exit codes verified in clean processes: empty → 1, normal → 0, `-AllowEmpty` → 0. - All five pipeline/workflow files parse; both PowerShell scripts parse. - Action versions checked against the GitHub API and pinned to current majors. - [x] I have added all necessary documentation. - Rewrote the coverage section of `docs/DeveloperGuide.md` as *Required checks and coverage*, covering which checks belong in the ruleset and which must not, how coverage is measured, where the numbers appear, and why the two systems disagree. Corrected the stale "BLOCKS" wording in `coverage-thresholds.json`. - [x] I have verified that my changes do not introduce (new) build or analyzer warnings. - CI YAML, two PowerShell scripts and documentation only; no compilation involved. - [x] I ran **all** tests locally using the **UA.slnx** solution against at least .net **framework** and .net **10**, and all passed. - Not applicable — no product code changed. `Opc.Ua.Core.Schema.Tests` was run repeatedly on net10.0 (119 passed) to generate the real Cobertura fragments used to validate the gate. - [ ] I fixed **all** failing and flaky tests in the CI pipelines and **all** CodeQL warnings. - [x] I have addressed **all** PR feedback received. - Feedback on the path-relevance diff (now a merge-base diff) and the target-framework numbering in `docs/DeveloperGuide.md` is fixed in `15b8e38df`. - A review pass over the gate/coverage split produced the four correctness fixes listed above, in `863eefc4d`. --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 26aa55a2-5731-4a4c-b61c-df2f7a785eca	2026-08-07 06:56:05 +02:00
Marc Schier	ea0f266b66	Move build and test to the Azure DevOps managed pool and replace Codecov with an in-pipeline coverage gate (#4122) ... # Description Moves the all-target-framework build, the cross-platform test matrix and the Native AoT run from GitHub Actions onto the Azure DevOps `netstandard` Managed DevOps Pool, and replaces Codecov with a coverage gate that runs inside the pipeline. ## 1. CI backend switch One conceptual switch decides who owns that work. It is checked into source in **two places that must be flipped together**: | File | Setting | Default | | --- | --- | --- | | `azure-pipelines.yml` | `parameters.ciBuildBackend` | `ado` | | `.github/workflows/buildandtest.yml` | `env.CI_BUILD_BACKEND` | `ado` | Setting both to `actions` restores the previous behaviour exactly. Azure Pipelines gains what it was missing to take the work over: - A **Linux all-TFM `sln.yml` leg**, replacing `build-all-tfm-linux`. `sln.yml` gets a `configurations` parameter so this leg builds `Release` only instead of doubling the managed-pool job count. - A **Linux agent in the `net10.0` `testfastpr` matrix**, replacing the ubuntu `build-and-test` job. - **Native AoT and Code Coverage now gate pull requests** instead of running only on Schedule/Manual. The coverage stage drops its `testdebug` dependency, which is Schedule/Manual-only and would otherwise have skipped coverage on every PR. - On a PR, Windows builds the .NET Framework TFMs and Linux the modern ones — mirroring the split the GitHub Actions jobs used — so all seven TFMs stay covered without fanning every TFM across both pools. Two things are deliberately **not** covered by the switch: - **macOS** stays on GitHub-hosted runners, because Managed DevOps Pools provide no macOS image. - **`master378` and `develop/*`** keep running the GitHub Actions jobs, since Azure Pipelines only builds `master`/`main` from this file. GitHub Actions does not expose the `env` context to job-level `if:` conditions, so the switch is resolved once in the existing `discover` job and re-exported as job outputs. A new **`build-and-test summary`** job gives branch protection one stable check to require, instead of the generated matrix job names. It treats an intentionally skipped job as success but still fails on a real failure or cancellation. The `paths:` allow-list was moved off the `pull_request` trigger and into `discover`. A workflow filtered out by `paths` never reports its checks, and a required check that never reports leaves a PR permanently *"Expected — waiting for status to be reported"*. That would have made the routine "ratchet the coverage floor" PR (which touches only `coverage-thresholds.json` and docs) unmergeable. ## 2. Coverage gate replacing Codecov Codecov is removed entirely — `codecov.yml`, both uploads, the badge, and the token usage. `.azurepipelines/check-coverage.ps1` runs at the end of the `Code Coverage` stage against the Cobertura report ReportGenerator already merges, driven by `coverage-thresholds.json`: | Check | Behaviour | | --- | --- | | Project floor | **Blocking** — total line and branch rates against an absolute floor. | | Patch coverage | **Blocking on PRs** — changed lines must reach `patch.target`, tolerating `patch.threshold` percentage points (the same semantics `codecov/patch` had). | | Baseline delta | **Advisory** — reports the change against the recorded baseline, never fails. | The project rate is recomputed from the per-line data rather than read off the Cobertura root element, so the `ignore` globs carried over from `codecov.yml` apply to the project floor as well as to the changed-lines gate — otherwise samples and generated code would count towards one gate but not the other. `testcc.yml` gains an explicit `checkout: self` with `fetchDepth: 0`, because the default shallow clone cannot diff against the base branch. ## Follow-up actions for maintainers Two items cannot be automated from source: 1. **Enable the `/azp run` gate.** In the Azure DevOps portal: pipeline → **More actions** → **Triggers** → **Pull request validation** → **Require a team member's comment before building a pull request**, scoped to *Only on pull requests from non-team members*. This makes Copilot-authored and outside-contributor PRs wait for a maintainer's `/azp run`, mirroring the approval GitHub Actions already requires. The documentation added here describes the workflow and the private-org-membership gotcha; **the setting itself still has to be switched on.** 2. **Update branch protection and secrets.** Drop the `codecov/project` and `codecov/patch` required checks, require `build-and-test summary` and the ADO coverage check instead, and remove `CODECOV_TOKEN` from the GitHub repository secrets and the ADO variable group. Also note the thresholds in `coverage-thresholds.json` are seeded from the last Codecov reading (73.61 %) with headroom, because the in-pipeline number had not been observed yet. The first full `Code Coverage` run on master should confirm it and the floors should be tightened then — the gate prints the exact figure it computes. ## Related Issues _No tracking issue; this is CI infrastructure work requested directly._ ## Checklist - [x] I have signed the [CLA](https://opcfoundation.org/license/cla/ContributorLicenseAgreementv1.0.pdf) and read the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) doc. - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works and increased code coverage. - No product code changed, so there are no unit tests to add. The new logic was verified with purpose-built harnesses instead: - All 8 branch/event/backend combinations of the `discover` switch, confirming `master378` and `develop/*` are untouched and that `actions` restores the old behaviour. - 12 scenarios for `check-coverage.ps1`: the project floor, the patch gate, ignore globs applying to *both* gates, three path-normalization shapes, and the advisory delta. - 14 path-relevance cases confirming the in-job filter matches the retired `paths:` allow-list exactly. - End-to-end against a **real** ReportGenerator report: correctly resolved `src/Opc.Ua.PubSub/DependencyInjection/PubSubBuilder.cs`, found exactly the four modified tracked lines and reported 50 % patch coverage (2 covered, 2 uncovered). - [x] I have added all necessary documentation. - New **Continuous integration** section in `docs/DeveloperGuide.md`, a CI note in `CONTRIBUTING.md`, and links from `docs/README.md`. Also corrected the CI matrix description, which claimed the PR gate ran net48 + **net8.0** — it runs net48 + **net10.0**. - [x] I have verified that my changes do not introduce (new) build or analyzer warnings. - `dotnet build src/Opc.Ua.Server` → 0 warnings, 0 errors. No product code changed. - [ ] I ran **all** tests locally using the **UA.slnx** solution against at least .net **framework** and .net **10**, and all passed. - Not applicable — no product code changed. `Opc.Ua.Server.Tests` was run on net10.0 during development (3480 passed; the single `ServerFluentApiHostingTests` failure is pre-existing and reproduces on master). - [ ] I fixed **all** failing and flaky tests in the CI pipelines and **all** CodeQL warnings. - [x] I have addressed **all** PR feedback received. - A review pass over this branch flagged the `paths:`-filter deadlock described above; it is fixed in `1926e240e`. --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 181ba7ea-c72f-42d7-a737-00a3faadaa17 Copilot-Session: 26aa55a2-5731-4a4c-b61c-df2f7a785eca	2026-07-31 21:06:25 +00:00