# Description Moves the all-target-framework build, the cross-platform test matrix and the Native AoT run from GitHub Actions onto the Azure DevOps `netstandard` Managed DevOps Pool, and replaces Codecov with a coverage gate that runs inside the pipeline. ## 1. CI backend switch One conceptual switch decides who owns that work. It is checked into source in **two places that must be flipped together**: | File | Setting | Default | | --- | --- | --- | | `azure-pipelines.yml` | `parameters.ciBuildBackend` | `ado` | | `.github/workflows/buildandtest.yml` | `env.CI_BUILD_BACKEND` | `ado` | Setting both to `actions` restores the previous behaviour exactly. Azure Pipelines gains what it was missing to take the work over: - A **Linux all-TFM `sln.yml` leg**, replacing `build-all-tfm-linux`. `sln.yml` gets a `configurations` parameter so this leg builds `Release` only instead of doubling the managed-pool job count. - A **Linux agent in the `net10.0` `testfastpr` matrix**, replacing the ubuntu `build-and-test` job. - **Native AoT and Code Coverage now gate pull requests** instead of running only on Schedule/Manual. The coverage stage drops its `testdebug` dependency, which is Schedule/Manual-only and would otherwise have skipped coverage on every PR. - On a PR, Windows builds the .NET Framework TFMs and Linux the modern ones — mirroring the split the GitHub Actions jobs used — so all seven TFMs stay covered without fanning every TFM across both pools. Two things are deliberately **not** covered by the switch: - **macOS** stays on GitHub-hosted runners, because Managed DevOps Pools provide no macOS image. - **`master378` and `develop/*`** keep running the GitHub Actions jobs, since Azure Pipelines only builds `master`/`main` from this file. GitHub Actions does not expose the `env` context to job-level `if:` conditions, so the switch is resolved once in the existing `discover` job and re-exported as job outputs. A new **`build-and-test summary`** job gives branch protection one stable check to require, instead of the generated matrix job names. It treats an intentionally skipped job as success but still fails on a real failure or cancellation. The `paths:` allow-list was moved off the `pull_request` trigger and into `discover`. A workflow filtered out by `paths` never reports its checks, and a required check that never reports leaves a PR permanently *"Expected — waiting for status to be reported"*. That would have made the routine "ratchet the coverage floor" PR (which touches only `coverage-thresholds.json` and docs) unmergeable. ## 2. Coverage gate replacing Codecov Codecov is removed entirely — `codecov.yml`, both uploads, the badge, and the token usage. `.azurepipelines/check-coverage.ps1` runs at the end of the `Code Coverage` stage against the Cobertura report ReportGenerator already merges, driven by `coverage-thresholds.json`: | Check | Behaviour | | --- | --- | | Project floor | **Blocking** — total line and branch rates against an absolute floor. | | Patch coverage | **Blocking on PRs** — changed lines must reach `patch.target`, tolerating `patch.threshold` percentage points (the same semantics `codecov/patch` had). | | Baseline delta | **Advisory** — reports the change against the recorded baseline, never fails. | The project rate is recomputed from the per-line data rather than read off the Cobertura root element, so the `ignore` globs carried over from `codecov.yml` apply to the project floor as well as to the changed-lines gate — otherwise samples and generated code would count towards one gate but not the other. `testcc.yml` gains an explicit `checkout: self` with `fetchDepth: 0`, because the default shallow clone cannot diff against the base branch. ## Follow-up actions for maintainers Two items cannot be automated from source: 1. **Enable the `/azp run` gate.** In the Azure DevOps portal: pipeline → **More actions** → **Triggers** → **Pull request validation** → **Require a team member's comment before building a pull request**, scoped to *Only on pull requests from non-team members*. This makes Copilot-authored and outside-contributor PRs wait for a maintainer's `/azp run`, mirroring the approval GitHub Actions already requires. The documentation added here describes the workflow and the private-org-membership gotcha; **the setting itself still has to be switched on.** 2. **Update branch protection and secrets.** Drop the `codecov/project` and `codecov/patch` required checks, require `build-and-test summary` and the ADO coverage check instead, and remove `CODECOV_TOKEN` from the GitHub repository secrets and the ADO variable group. Also note the thresholds in `coverage-thresholds.json` are seeded from the last Codecov reading (73.61 %) with headroom, because the in-pipeline number had not been observed yet. The first full `Code Coverage` run on master should confirm it and the floors should be tightened then — the gate prints the exact figure it computes. ## Related Issues _No tracking issue; this is CI infrastructure work requested directly._ ## Checklist - [x] I have signed the [CLA](https://opcfoundation.org/license/cla/ContributorLicenseAgreementv1.0.pdf) and read the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) doc. - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works and increased code coverage. - No product code changed, so there are no unit tests to add. The new logic was verified with purpose-built harnesses instead: - All 8 branch/event/backend combinations of the `discover` switch, confirming `master378` and `develop/*` are untouched and that `actions` restores the old behaviour. - 12 scenarios for `check-coverage.ps1`: the project floor, the patch gate, ignore globs applying to *both* gates, three path-normalization shapes, and the advisory delta. - 14 path-relevance cases confirming the in-job filter matches the retired `paths:` allow-list exactly. - End-to-end against a **real** ReportGenerator report: correctly resolved `src/Opc.Ua.PubSub/DependencyInjection/PubSubBuilder.cs`, found exactly the four modified tracked lines and reported 50 % patch coverage (2 covered, 2 uncovered). - [x] I have added all necessary documentation. - New **Continuous integration** section in `docs/DeveloperGuide.md`, a CI note in `CONTRIBUTING.md`, and links from `docs/README.md`. Also corrected the CI matrix description, which claimed the PR gate ran net48 + **net8.0** — it runs net48 + **net10.0**. - [x] I have verified that my changes do not introduce (new) build or analyzer warnings. - `dotnet build src/Opc.Ua.Server` → 0 warnings, 0 errors. No product code changed. - [ ] I ran **all** tests locally using the **UA.slnx** solution against at least .net **framework** and .net **10**, and all passed. - Not applicable — no product code changed. `Opc.Ua.Server.Tests` was run on net10.0 during development (3480 passed; the single `ServerFluentApiHostingTests` failure is pre-existing and reproduces on master). - [ ] I fixed **all** failing and flaky tests in the CI pipelines and **all** CodeQL warnings. - [x] I have addressed **all** PR feedback received. - A review pass over this branch flagged the `paths:`-filter deadlock described above; it is fixed in `1926e240e`. --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 181ba7ea-c72f-42d7-a737-00a3faadaa17 Copilot-Session: 26aa55a2-5731-4a4c-b61c-df2f7a785eca
1.1 KiB
Contributing
We strongly encourage community participation and contribution to this project. First, please fork the repository and commit your changes there. Once happy with your changes you can generate a 'pull request'.
You must agree to the contributor license agreement before we can accept your changes. The CLA and "I AGREE" button is automatically displayed when you perform the pull request. You can preview CLA here.
Continuous integration on your pull request
Builds are not started automatically for pull requests from outside contributors — including those opened by the GitHub Copilot coding agent. A maintainer reviews the change first and then comments /azp run to start the Azure Pipelines validation build, and approves the GitHub Actions workflows. If your pull request shows no checks yet, this is expected; please wait for a maintainer rather than pushing empty commits.
See Continuous integration in the developer guide for what the pipelines run, and for the coverage gates your change has to satisfy.