# Description Drops support for **netstandard2.1** and **.NET Framework 4.7.2**. Libraries now target `net48`, `net8.0`, `net9.0` and `net10.0`. `Opc.Ua.Types` and `Opc.Ua.SourceGeneration.Core` still also target `netstandard2.0`, but only because the Roslyn source generators load them. There is no general netstandard2.0 support. **Preprocessor directives** (112 files) - Every `#if`/`#elif` mentioning `NETSTANDARD2_1*`, `NET472*`, `NET_STANDARD_TESTS`, `SKIP_ECC_CERTIFICATE_REQUEST_SIGNING` or `NETSTANDARD*` was evaluated against the remaining TFM set (net48, net8/9/10, plus netstandard2.0 inside `Opc.Ua.Types`/`tools`) and simplified. Dead branches were removed. - Example: `NETSTANDARD2_1 || NET8_0_OR_GREATER` → `NET8_0_OR_GREATER`. - Example: `NET8_0_OR_GREATER || NET472_OR_GREATER` → removed (always true). - Netstandard-only code was removed: `UnixFileModeShim`, the CRDT reflection path in `ReplicatedGossipOptions.CreateReaderOptions`, and the netstandard2.1-only test variants. **Custom test logic** - `targets.props` drops the `net472`, `netstandard2.0` and `netstandard2.1` `CustomTestTarget` profiles, `NetStandardTests` and `SKIP_ECC_CERTIFICATE_REQUEST_SIGNING`. Supported values are now `net48`, `net8.0`, `net9.0`, `net10.0`. - The `NET_STANDARD_TESTS` define is removed from 29 test projects. - The "build netstandard shells as net10.0" overrides are removed from 18 projects. - `RestrictForLegacyTfm` now only applies to `net48`. - `tests/customtest.bat` is updated to the new values. **Build / packaging / CI** - MSBuild TFM conditions are simplified: Kestrel package choice, MQTTnet v4 (net48 only), BouncyCastle, Di/OpenUsd/Vision/Stress test excludes, and `System.IO.FileSystem.AccessControl` (dropped from Core). - The MigrationAnalyzer nuspec drops its net472/netstandard2.1 lib groups. The Azure signing lists are updated. - `get-ci-matrix.ps1` removes the net472/netstandard test profiles (including the PR-gating `linux-netstandard2.1`) and the matching build legs. **Breaking API change (2.0 preview):** removed `HttpsTransportListener.IsWssTransportSupported` and `ReplicatedGossipOptions.IsGossipStateDecodingSupported`. They only returned `false` on netstandard2.1 and are now always `true`. The test guards that used them were removed as well. **Docs** - NuGet READMEs, `README.md`, `DeveloperGuide.md`, `PubSub.md`, the certificate/ECC/identity docs and the 2.0 migration guide (plus its `.agents` skill mirror) are updated. - The migration guide notes that 4.7.2 consumers must move to 4.8 and netstandard2.1 consumers to net8.0+. ### Reviewer notes - The `System.IO.FileSystem.AccessControl` `PackageVersion` pin is left in `Directory.Packages.props`. It has no direct reference any more, but transitive pinning is on, so it was kept to avoid shifting resolved versions. - The `#if` rewrite was done mechanically by a truth-table evaluator. The diff in the `.cs` files is limited to directive lines, removed dead branches, and stale-comment updates. ### Verified locally - `dotnet build UA.slnx -p:CustomTestTarget=net48`: 0 errors. - `dotnet build UA.slnx -p:CustomTestTarget=net10.0`: 0 errors. - Default multi-target builds (no `CustomTestTarget`) of Opc.Ua.Types, Bindings.Https, PubSub.Mqtt and Redundancy.Server succeeded. - net10.0 tests: - Opc.Ua.Redundancy.Server.Tests: 840/840 passed. - Opc.Ua.Types.Tests: 11363 passed, 1 skipped. - ModelDependencyScanner tests: 20/20 passed. - The full test suite was **not** run locally. ## Related Issues - None ## Checklist - [ ] I have signed the [CLA](https://opcfoundation.org/license/cla/ContributorLicenseAgreementv1.0.pdf) and read the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) doc. - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works and increased code coverage. - [x] I have added all necessary documentation. - [ ] I have verified that my changes do not introduce (new) build or analyzer warnings. - [ ] I ran **all** tests locally using the **UA.slnx** solution against at least .net **framework** and .net **10**, and all passed. - [ ] I fixed **all** failing and flaky tests in the CI pipelines and **all** CodeQL warnings. - [ ] I have addressed **all** PR feedback received. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
16 KiB
Support for Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Certificates in Server and Client Applications
Server and client applications support encrypted communication with RSA and elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) certificates. This guide explains how to configure both certificate types.
Contents
- Previous client and server configuration (RSA only)
- Previous server configuration (RSA only)
- New client and server configuration (RSA and ECC)
- New server configuration for ECC
- Old and new configuration compatibility
- Configure GDS for ECC
- Known limitations
The previous configuration supports RSA certificates. The new configuration supports both RSA and ECC certificates. The guide also describes compatibility and ECC limitations.
Previous Client and Server application configuration supports only RSA certificates
Up to now, the configuration supported encrypted communication using only the RSA encryption algorithm. That means that the server and client certificates were RSA certificates and there was just one RSA certificate per application needed to be configured.
The XML tag which contained the RSA certificate to be configured was <ApplicationCertificate>. This tag is still used for the RSA certificate configuration in backward compatibility mode as further described below:
<!-- The security configuration for the server. -->
<SecurityConfiguration>
<!-- Where the application instance certificate is stored (MachineDefault) -->
<ApplicationCertificate>
<StoreType>Directory</StoreType>
<StorePath>%LocalApplicationData%/OPC Foundation/pki/own</StorePath>
<SubjectName>CN=Quickstart Reference Server, C=US, S=Arizona, O=OPC Foundation, DC=localhost</SubjectName>
</ApplicationCertificate>
....
</SecurityConfiguration>
Previous Server application configuration supports only RSA certificates
For Server applications the configuration of the RSA certificate involves also specifying the SecurityPolicies to be supported by the server:
<!-- The security configuration for the server. -->
<SecurityConfiguration>
<!-- The security policy to use. -->
<SecurityPolicies>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>SignAndEncrypt_3</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri>http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#Basic256Sha256</SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>None_1</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri>http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#None</SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>Sign_2</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri></SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>SignAndEncrypt_3</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri></SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
....
</SecurityConfiguration>
New Client and Server application configuration support both RSA and ECC certificates
With the newly introduced support for ECC certificates, the configuration of the server application has been extended to support both RSA and ECC certificates. The XML tag under which both the RSA and ECC certificates are configured is <ApplicationCertificates>.
The <ApplicationCertificate> tag is still used for the RSA certificate configuration in backward compatibility mode, meaning that old server configurations are still supported, but they cannot simultaneously coexist.
The new configuration of the server application is described below:
<!-- The security configuration for the server. -->
<SecurityConfiguration>
<!-- Where the application instance certificate is stored (MachineDefault) -->
<ApplicationCertificates>
<CertificateIdentifier>
<StoreType>Directory</StoreType>
<StorePath>%LocalApplicationData%/OPC Foundation/pki/own</StorePath>
<SubjectName>CN=Quickstart Reference Server, C=US, S=Arizona, O=OPC Foundation, DC=localhost</SubjectName>
<CertificateTypeString>RsaSha256</CertificateTypeString>
</CertificateIdentifier>
<CertificateIdentifier>
<!-- <TypeId>NistP256</TypeId> -->
<StoreType>Directory</StoreType>
<StorePath>%LocalApplicationData%/OPC Foundation/pki/own</StorePath>
<SubjectName>CN=Quickstart Reference Server, C=US, S=Arizona, O=OPC Foundation, DC=localhost</SubjectName>
<CertificateTypeString>NistP256</CertificateTypeString>
</CertificateIdentifier>
<CertificateIdentifier>
<!-- <TypeId>NistP384</TypeId> -->
<StoreType>Directory</StoreType>
<StorePath>%LocalApplicationData%/OPC Foundation/pki/own</StorePath>
<SubjectName>CN=Quickstart Reference Server, C=US, S=Arizona, O=OPC Foundation, DC=localhost</SubjectName>
<CertificateTypeString>NistP384</CertificateTypeString>
</CertificateIdentifier>
<CertificateIdentifier>
<!-- <TypeId>BrainpoolP256r1</TypeId> -->
<StoreType>Directory</StoreType>
<StorePath>%LocalApplicationData%/OPC Foundation/pki/own</StorePath>
<SubjectName>CN=Quickstart Reference Server, C=US, S=Arizona, O=OPC Foundation, DC=localhost</SubjectName>
<CertificateTypeString>BrainpoolP256r1</CertificateTypeString>
</CertificateIdentifier>
<CertificateIdentifier>
<!-- <TypeId>BrainpoolP384r1</TypeId> -->
<StoreType>Directory</StoreType>
<StorePath>%LocalApplicationData%/OPC Foundation/pki/own</StorePath>
<SubjectName>CN=Quickstart Reference Server, C=US, S=Arizona, O=OPC Foundation, DC=localhost</SubjectName>
<CertificateTypeString>BrainpoolP384r1</CertificateTypeString>
</CertificateIdentifier>
</ApplicationCertificates>
....
</SecurityConfiguration>
This layout of the configuration file allows the server to support both RSA and ECC certificates and allows the server to generate certificates of different types. The <CertificateTypeString> tag is used to specify the type of the certificate.
The supported types are:
RsaSha256for RSA certificatesNistP256for ECC certificates with NIST P256 curveNistP384for ECC certificates with NIST P384 curveBrainpoolP256r1for ECC certificates with Brainpool P256r1 curveBrainpoolP384r1for ECC certificates with Brainpool P384r1 curve
Additionally, this layout enables the user to select a specific <SubjectName> for each certificate. This is useful when the user wants to generate certificates with different <SubjectName>s.
New Server application configuration related to ECC certificates
The Server applications can configure the supported SecurityPolicies in the same way as before, but now the SecurityPolicies can be configured for each ECC specific SecurityPolicyUri which is to be supported by the server:
<!-- The security configuration for the server. -->
<SecurityConfiguration>
<!-- The security policy to use. -->
<SecurityPolicies>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>SignAndEncrypt_3</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri>http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#Basic256Sha256</SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>Sign_2</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri></SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>SignAndEncrypt_3</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri></SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>Sign_2</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri>http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#ECC_nistP256</SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>Sign_2</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri>http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#ECC_nistP384</SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>Sign_2</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri>http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#ECC_brainpoolP256r1</SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>Sign_2</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri>http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#ECC_brainpoolP384r1</SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>SignAndEncrypt_3</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri>http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#ECC_nistP256</SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>SignAndEncrypt_3</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri>http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#ECC_nistP384</SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>SignAndEncrypt_3</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri>http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#ECC_brainpoolP256r1<SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
<ServerSecurityPolicy>
<SecurityMode>SignAndEncrypt_3</SecurityMode>
<SecurityPolicyUri>http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#ECC_brainpoolP384r1</SecurityPolicyUri>
</ServerSecurityPolicy>
</SecurityPolicies>
....
</SecurityConfiguration>
With the introduction of ECC certificates, the <SecurityPolicies> section of the configuration file has been extended to support ECC specific SecurityPolicies. The ECC specific SecurityPolicies are the following:
http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#ECC_nistP256http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#ECC_nistP384http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#ECC_brainpoolP256r1http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#ECC_brainpoolP384r1
For every ECC-specific policy in <SecurityPolicies>, the server must have
a corresponding ECC certificate in <ApplicationCertificates>. Its
CertificateTypeString must match the policy's curve. If a corresponding
certificate is missing, the server cannot start.
The server encrypts each UserIdentityToken with the certificate selected
by the active security policy or by the <SecurityPolicyUri> in its
<UserTokenPolicy>. To explicitly list the policies supported for user
identity tokens, configure them in <UserTokenPolicies>. They must also
appear in <SecurityPolicies>.
The following example shows how the server can specify the supported <SecurityPolicy>s for the UserIdentityTokens:
<!-- The SDK expects the server to support the same set of user tokens for every endpoint. -->
<UserTokenPolicies>
<!-- Allows anonymous users -->
<ua:UserTokenPolicy>
<ua:TokenType>Anonymous_0</ua:TokenType>
<!-- <ua:SecurityPolicyUri>http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#None</ua:SecurityPolicyUri> -->
</ua:UserTokenPolicy>
<!-- Allows username/password with password encrypted using the active security policy-->
<ua:UserTokenPolicy>
<ua:TokenType>UserName_1</ua:TokenType>
<!-- passwords must be encrypted - this specifies what algorithm to use -->
<!-- if no algorithm is specified, the active security policy is used -->
<!-- <ua:SecurityPolicyUri>http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#Basic256Sha256</ua:SecurityPolicyUri> -->
</ua:UserTokenPolicy>
<!-- Allows username/password with password encrypted using ECC security-->
<ua:UserTokenPolicy>
<ua:TokenType>UserName_1</ua:TokenType>
<!-- passwords must be encrypted - this specifies what algorithm to use -->
<!-- if no algorithm is specified, the active security policy is used -->
<ua:SecurityPolicyUri>http://opcfoundation.org/UA/SecurityPolicy#Basic256Sha256</ua:SecurityPolicyUri>
</ua:UserTokenPolicy>
</UserTokenPolicies>
You can omit <SecurityPolicyUri> from <UserTokenPolicy>. In that case,
the server uses the active security policy to encrypt the
UserIdentityToken. Therefore, each policy listed in <UserTokenPolicies>
must also appear in <SecurityPolicies>.
If <UserTokenPolicies> names a policy that <SecurityPolicies> does not
include, the configuration is invalid.
"Old" Client and Server application configuration format VS "New" Client and Server application configuration format
Applications using the old configuration continue to use RSA certificates
configured with <ApplicationCertificate>. The server must not list ECC
policies in <SecurityPolicies>. These applications cannot communicate with
peers that require ECC certificates.
Applications using the new configuration can support both RSA and ECC
certificates. Configure both certificate types with
<ApplicationCertificates>, then list the supported policies in
<SecurityPolicies>, including any ECC policies.
Use <UserTokenPolicies> to configure the policies used to encrypt user
identity tokens. These policies must also appear in <SecurityPolicies>.
Do not combine the old and new configuration formats. A configuration file
cannot contain both <ApplicationCertificate> and
<ApplicationCertificates>.
Configure GDS for use with ECC Certificates
To use ECC certificates with the Global Discovery Server (GDS), update its configuration as shown below.
<Extensions>
<ua:XmlElement>
<GlobalDiscoveryServerConfiguration xmlns="http://opcfoundation.org/UA/GDS/Configuration.xsd">
<CertificateGroups>
<CertificateGroupConfiguration>
<Id>Default</Id>
<CertificateType>RsaSha256ApplicationCertificateType</CertificateType>
Replace the <CertificateType> node of the Default CertificateGroupConfiguration with the <CertificateTypes> node.
This allows the Certificate Group to have multiple CA Certificates for the different Certificate types.
<Extensions>
<ua:XmlElement>
<GlobalDiscoveryServerConfiguration xmlns="http://opcfoundation.org/UA/GDS/Configuration.xsd">
<CertificateGroups>
<CertificateGroupConfiguration>
<Id>Default</Id>
<CertificateTypes>
<ua:String>RsaSha256ApplicationCertificateType</ua:String>
<ua:String>EccNistP256ApplicationCertificateType</ua:String>
<ua:String>EccNistP384ApplicationCertificateType</ua:String>
</CertificateTypes>
The old Configuration format is still supported but only supports either RSA or ECC Certificates for a single CertificateGroup. The GDS checks on startup if a valid configuration was supplied.
Known Limitations
Not all curves are supported by all OS platforms and not all .NET implementations offer cryptographic API support for all curve types.
ECC security policies require the .NET 8 or later build of the stack.
OPC UA Part 6 feeds the raw ECDH shared secret into HKDF. The older
ECDiffieHellman.DeriveKeyMaterial API applies a hash first and is not a
compatible substitute. Consequently the .NET Framework 4.8
builds do not advertise or accept the built-in ECC
SecureChannel or user-token policies, even when loaded by a newer runtime.
SecurityPolicies.GetInfo returns null for those unavailable policies.
Use a .NET 8+ application and the matching stack assets for ECC endpoints,
or configure a supported RSA policy on both peers. ECC certificate parsing
and signing are separate capabilities and remain subject to OS curve support.
The supported ECC curve types are the following:
NistP256for ECC certificates with NIST P256 curveNistP384for ECC certificates with NIST P384 curveBrainpoolP256r1for ECC certificates with Brainpool P256r1 curveBrainpoolP384r1for ECC certificates with Brainpool P384r1 curve