mirror of
https://github.com/colbymchenry/codegraph.git
synced 2026-10-17 05:07:37 +08:00
Colby McHenry
abee46c5e4
Re-runs CG-15's agent A/B on the fixed build: same harness, same three prompts, same baseline ref, n=6 per arm on express and excalidraw. Read = 0 in all 15 new-arm runs. The express regression that routed the defect to CG-21 does not reproduce in 6 attempts, and the baseline now reads in 4 of 6 while the new arm reads in none (median 24.5s -> 21.5s), so the control beats the arm it previously lost to. client-go holds 92.7-96.2% answer share against a baseline run at 53.8%. Excalidraw's new arm is ~8s slower at the median and that is recorded as NOT attributable to the build rather than waved through: explore's own latency is 374ms vs 372ms on the same query and index, the deterministic responses differ by +2% with one byte-identical, and the unchanged main build's own median moved 34s -> 26.5s between the two sessions — the same magnitude as the gap. Bars were not re-baselined; they are CG-15's four, applied to a larger sample. The CG-15 section is kept intact and marked superseded, because its root-cause analysis is the record of why the fix looks like it does.