From 876915edd304aba1bbdf0c51befe8ea4e5ba7199 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NRK <nrk@disroot.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 22:33:38 +0600
Subject: [PATCH] ta: don't hardcode alignment requirement

use standard C11 max_align_t instead.

also sorts the standard header includes.

ref: https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/types/max_align_t
---
 ta/ta.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ta/ta.c b/ta/ta.c
index d67568adfd..a4d3ac6052 100644
--- a/ta/ta.c
+++ b/ta/ta.c
@@ -13,18 +13,15 @@
  * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
  */
 
+#include <assert.h>
+#include <stddef.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
-#include <stdio.h>
-#include <assert.h>
 
 #define TA_NO_WRAPPERS
 #include "ta.h"
 
-// Note: the actual minimum alignment is dictated by malloc(). It doesn't
-//       make sense to set this value higher than malloc's alignment.
-#define MIN_ALIGN 16
-
 #if !defined(TA_MEMORY_DEBUGGING)
     #if !defined(NDEBUG)
         #define TA_MEMORY_DEBUGGING 1
@@ -52,6 +49,7 @@ struct ta_header {
 
 #define CANARY 0xD3ADB3EF
 
+#define MIN_ALIGN _Alignof(max_align_t)
 union aligned_header {
     struct ta_header ta;
     // Make sure to satisfy typical alignment requirements